The Question That Unlocks the Deal Why I Never Accept the “Problem” Without Testing It

The Question That Unlocks the Deal Why I Never Accept the “Problem” Without Testing It

The Question That Unlocks the Deal

Why I Never Accept the “Problem” Without Testing It

By Jai Thompson


Introduction

I manage a private equity platform deploying 13–18 million per quarter across multiple real estate asset classes.

Our model is asset-based, escrow-directed, and execution-driven, allowing us to close in 23 days or less with certainty and clean title flow.

We acquire and operate across:

• Luxury estates
• Single-family residential portfolios
• Multifamily communities
• Hospitality and hotels
• Mixed-use properties
• RV parks and mobile home communities
• Golf resorts and destination assets
• Specialized housing and income portfolios

Capital is structured, operators are paid, reserves are built in, and all disbursements are controlled through escrow.

We deploy with discipline, transparency, and speed—while tithing back to the communities we serve.

Contact Mr. Jai Thompson
📧
MrJai@kingjairealestategroup.zohodesk.com

📞 Call or Text: 980-353-2408

Structure over sacrifice. Stewardship over struggle. Every deal builds legacy.


The Moment Most Investors Kill the Deal

In real estate negotiations there is a silent killer.

It happens the moment someone says:

“The bank won’t allow it.”

Most people hear that and stop thinking.

They repeat the obstacle.

They worship the obstacle.

They preserve the obstacle like it is sacred truth.

And the deal dies.

What my mentor Marco Kozlowski teaches is simple but powerful:

Never accept the problem until you test the problem.


The Psychological Trap

Here is the pattern that kills deals.

  1. Someone states a problem

  2. Everyone assumes it is absolute truth

  3. No one asks the next question

Example:

Seller owes
$6,000,000

Property value
$5,500,000

Seller believes they must bring

$500,000 to closing.

The agent repeats it.

The broker repeats it.

Everyone repeats it.

And suddenly the problem becomes law.

But it might not be.


The Three Magic Questions

These questions unlock deals because they introduce curiosity instead of conflict.

Question One – The Curiosity Door

“Let me ask you something simple. If there were a clean, legal way for the seller to avoid writing that check, would that be worth exploring?”

This does three things:

• reframes the problem
• introduces possibility
• tests openness

No pitch.

No numbers.

Just curiosity.


Question Two – The Outcome Test

“What outcome would the seller prefer if the bank was satisfied?”

This shifts the conversation from

bank rules

to

seller outcomes.


Question Three – The Reality Check

“Is that actually a rule, or is that just how the bank normally handles it?”

This question often exposes assumptions.

Many “rules” are simply habits.


Why This Works

Agents often focus on the obstacle:

“The bank says no.”

But the reality is:

The bank doesn’t own the property.

The seller does.

And the seller has a problem.

Your job is to explore solutions to that problem.


How I Apply This In My Deals

Because our acquisitions are structured with an asset-based capital stack, we are always exploring alternative outcomes.

Instead of arguing with the obstacle, I ask the question that unlocks the door.

Examples include:

• structured seller payoff
• subject-to structures
• escrow-controlled disbursements
• recorded price strategies
• deferred consideration
• operational buyouts

But none of those matter until the seller says:

“Yes, I’m open to another option.”

And that happens with one question.


Roleplay Training: 10 Back-and-Forth Seller Conversation

Exchange 1

Investor
“I understand the seller believes they need to bring $500K to closing. Let me ask something simple—if there were a clean way to avoid that, would that be worth exploring?”

Agent
“Well the bank says that’s what has to happen.”


Exchange 2

Investor
“Totally fair. My question isn’t about the bank yet. I’m asking about the seller—would they prefer an option where they don’t bring that check?”

Agent
“I mean… of course they would.”


Exchange 3

Investor
“Great. Then the real question is whether we can structure something that satisfies the bank and solves the seller’s problem.”

Agent
“Possibly, but banks don’t usually do that.”


Exchange 4

Investor
“Understood. Out of curiosity—has anyone asked the bank about alternative structures yet?”

Agent
“No, not really.”


Exchange 5

Investor
“Then we might be solving a problem that hasn’t been tested yet.”

Agent
“That’s actually a good point.”


Exchange 6

Investor
“If we could structure a solution where the seller exits without bringing that $500K, would they want to see it?”

Agent
“Yes, absolutely.”


Exchange 7

Investor
“Perfect. Then the next step is simple—let’s explore what outcome the seller would prefer.”

Agent
“Okay.”


Exchange 8

Investor
“Would the seller prioritize speed, tax efficiency, or maximum recovery?”

Agent
“Probably speed.”


Exchange 9

Investor
“Good. Because our platform closes in about 23 days through escrow-directed structures.”

Agent
“That could definitely interest them.”


Exchange 10

Investor
“Great. Let’s schedule a quick conversation with the seller so we can explore solutions together.”


Email Script Using The Magic Questions

Subject: Quick question about the seller’s outcome

Hi [Agent Name],

I understand the seller believes they may need to bring funds to closing.

Quick question.

If there were a clean, legal structure that allowed the seller to exit without writing that check, would that be worth exploring?

Our acquisitions are asset-based and escrow-directed, which allows us to close quickly while solving complex seller situations.

If the seller is open to options, I’d be happy to walk through a few possibilities.

Best regards,
Jai Thompson


Text Message Version

Hi [Name], quick question.

If there were a clean way for the seller to avoid bringing that $500K to closing, would they be open to exploring it?

Just trying to understand the outcome they would prefer.


The Real Lesson

The biggest mistake investors make is believing the obstacle without testing it.

Most deals don’t die because of numbers.

They die because curiosity disappears.

Solutions appear when someone asks the next question.

And often that question is simple.

“If there were a clean way to solve this… would you want to see it?”

That one question has opened more doors in my career than any pitch.

Because curiosity unlocks possibility.

And possibility creates deals.


Structure over sacrifice.
Stewardship over struggle.
Every deal builds legacy.


______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Jai — when Marco Kozlowski says “assume the loan can be assumable without the $500K check”, he is teaching a thinking exercise, not necessarily stating the bank already agreed.

He’s saying:

Start from possibility first, not limitation.

If the seller thinks they must write a $500K check, that means the deal likely looks like this:

The Situation (Example)

Loan balance
$5,000,000

Market value
$4,500,000

Shortfall
$500,000

Seller believes they must bring $500K to closing to pay the bank.

Marco’s mindset:

“What if that’s not the only path?”

So you explore structures that remove the $500K check.

Below are the most realistic options.


6 Possible Structures Without the $500K Check

1️⃣ Loan Assumption

The buyer takes over the existing loan.

Example:

Loan balance
$5,000,000

Buyer assumes loan
Seller walks away

Possible additions:

• small equity note
• future profit share
• deferred payment

Seller avoids writing a check.

Why banks allow this sometimes:

• loan stays performing
• no foreclosure risk
• same collateral


2️⃣ Subject-To Structure

Buyer takes title subject to the existing mortgage.

Loan stays in seller name but buyer makes payments.

Example:

Loan balance
$5,000,000

Buyer takes title
Buyer pays loan

Seller avoids paying the $500K deficit.

Common use case:

Distressed sellers or time pressure.


3️⃣ Seller Carry for the Gap

Seller finances the $500K gap instead of writing a check.

Example:

Loan balance assumed
$5,000,000

Seller carry note
$500,000

Payments over time.

Seller avoids paying cash today.


4️⃣ Structured Payoff / Deferred Consideration

Part of the payoff is paid later.

Example:

Bank payoff now
$4,500,000

Remaining $500K structured as

• deferred payout
• future sale share
• performance note

Seller avoids writing a check.


5️⃣ Bank Short Payoff Negotiation

Buyer negotiates with lender.

Example:

Loan balance
$5,000,000

Bank accepts payoff
$4,500,000

Why banks sometimes do this:

• faster resolution
• avoid foreclosure costs
• avoid market risk


6️⃣ Equity Participation

Seller trades the $500K deficit for future upside.

Example:

Seller avoids paying $500K

Instead receives:

• 10% future equity
• profit share on refinance or sale

Seller participates instead of paying.


Why Marco Teaches This

Because the conversation normally goes like this:

Agent says

“The bank said no.”

Everyone stops thinking.

Marco teaches:

Never worship the obstacle.

Instead ask:

“If there were a clean way for the seller to avoid bringing $500K to closing, would that interest them?”

Now the seller is open to options.


How This Applies To Your Model

Your 85 / 45 / 24 structure actually works well with this mindset.

Example:

Property value
$4,500,000

Offer at 85%

4,500,000 × 0.85 = 3,825,000

Recorded price at 45%

4,500,000 × 0.45 = 2,025,000

Lender funds at 24%

4,500,000 × 0.24 = 1,080,000

Seller payoff logic

Offer (85%) − Lender (24%)
3,825,000 − 1,080,000 = 2,745,000 seller legacy payoff

Instead of a $500K check, the seller could receive structured payoff over time.


The Real Lesson Marco Is Teaching

The deal usually dies before numbers are even explored.

Because someone says:

“The bank said no.”

But the real question is:

Has anyone explored another structure?


The Question That Unlocks The Door

Use this wording:

“Let me ask something simple. If there were a clean, legal way for the seller to avoid writing that $500K check, would that be worth exploring?”

If the answer is yes…

The deal is alive again.


______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Marco’s 3 Magic Questions (Exact Structure)

Question 1 — The Possibility Door

This breaks the hypnosis around the obstacle.

“Let me ask something simple. If there were a clean, legal way for the seller to avoid bringing that $500,000 to closing, would that be worth exploring?”

Why it works:

• You are not pitching
• You are not disagreeing
• You are introducing possibility

Most people say yes immediately.


Question 2 — The Outcome Question

Now you shift the focus from the bank to the seller.

“If the bank was satisfied, what outcome would the seller actually prefer?”

Why this works:

Agents usually focus on:

• loan payoff
• bank rules
• contract details

But the real question is:

What does the seller want?

Examples:

• exit quickly
• stop monthly losses
• avoid writing a check
• avoid foreclosure
• avoid taxes

Once you know that, you can structure a deal.


Question 3 — The Reality Test

This question exposes assumptions.

“Has anyone actually asked the bank if that structure is possible, or are we just assuming that’s the only way?”

Why this works:

A shocking number of deals die because:

• someone assumed the bank would say no
• no one actually asked

This question forces the agent to think.


The Conversation Flow

Here is how it normally plays out.

Agent:

“The seller has to bring $500K to closing.”

You:

Question 1

“Let me ask something simple. If there were a clean legal way for them to avoid bringing that check, would they want to explore it?”

Agent:

“Well… yes.”

You:

Question 2

“If the bank was satisfied, what outcome would the seller actually prefer?”

Agent:

“They just want out.”

You:

Question 3

“Has anyone asked the bank if another structure is possible yet?”

Agent:

“…actually no.”

Now the deal is back on the table.


The Psychology Behind These Questions

These questions work because they:

1️⃣ remove confrontation
2️⃣ shift the conversation to outcomes
3️⃣ expose assumptions

Most investors fail because they start with:

“Here’s my offer.”

Great investors start with:

“Let me ask something.”


Pretty Boi CEO™ Version

Your calm version could sound like this:

Question 1

“If there were a clean way for the seller to exit without writing that $500K check, would that be worth exploring?”

Question 2

“If the lender was satisfied, what outcome would the seller prefer?”

Question 3

“Has anyone tested whether the lender would consider alternative structures yet?”

Three questions.

No pressure.

No pitch.

Just curiosity.


Why This Matters For Your Model

Your asset-based escrow structure only works if the conversation stays open.

These questions keep the door open long enough for you to introduce:

• structured payoff
• subject-to
• assumption
• deferred consideration
• recorded price strategies

But those only come after the door opens.